![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | MWR Homepage | MWR New Stuff for Sale | MWR Maratac ZULU Straps | My Recent Topics | MWR Forums | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Main Forum This is the site for enthusiasts of military timepieces. All discussions related to military timepieces, and watches in general are welcome. While discussing non-issued watches and homage watches is permissible, misrepresentations and/or false claims of military provenance will not be tolerated. Secondly misrepresenting oneself as either a disinterested party or posting with a secondary or ulterior agenda (i.e. shilling) will not be acceptable. Please post your own personal watches for sale on the PX (not here.) Links to watches for sale are permissable as long as they are for discussion purposes. Links to fake and counterfeit watch sites are prohibited. While not mandatory, images of guns, knives, and Ninja spikes in conjunction with your watches are highly encouraged. There is a Zero Tolerance Policy in effect for rude and inconsiderate behavior. Opinions expressed here are those of the poster, and not necessarily those of the management. Any submissions to this site remain the property of the original author/contributor. Anonymous or inconsiderate postings may be deleted at the discretion of a moderator. Contact: admin@broadarrow.net |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Posts: 520
![]() |
.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 58
![]() |
Congratulations on such a unique find!
D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 704
![]() |
Quote:
You are right James, the ’53 RAF Omega was supplied in accordance with the provisional GS wristwatch specification DEF-3 (1 September 1951) with subsequent amendments and additions as called for by the Air Ministry. The key amendments related to the need for shock-proof balance staff mountings and corrosion inhibitor (VPI) paper. In answer to your query Ian, I personally would leave the watch in “as found condition”. Regards, ken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New England
Posts: 2
![]() |
Absolutely amazing!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 410
![]() |
Quote:
Don't have a clue as to what this means. Regards, Martin (isologue) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 49
![]() |
The white dial railmaster is a canada market watch thought to exist in very small numbers. There are at least 3 legit examples that have surfaced and a 4th one with somewhat more doubtful provenance so it is not a one off prototype. I suspect a few more examples exist in Canada to perhaps someday be located.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 410
![]() |
Quote:
Still don't have a clue as to what this means. Regards, Martin (isologue) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 70
![]() |
A proper watch. They don't get better than a 53.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 704
![]() |
Couldn’t agree with you more Simon. I consider the ’53 RAF Omega as the iconic military wristwatch. It has all the hallmarks of a well-designed military wristwatch: an uncluttered large dial layout, prominent and well-proportioned hands, and the cal 283 is bullet-proof. It has a real presence on the wrist because of its size and weight, and the fixed strap bars and stainless steel case reinforces its military credentials. The case-back markings are like no other. The Mk. 11 may be a favourite for many collectors (for good reason), but for me, the ’53 RAF Omega is number one on my top 10 list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 704
![]() |
I provided Ian's Omega RAF watch movement number to Omega (with his permission) and received the following reply:
Mvt 11.738.172 Cal 283 Ref CK 2506 Prod 18.08.1950 It appears Ian's movement was originally assigned to an Omega model CK 2506. Last edited by hq_sandman_ute : 05-02-2012 at 04:15. Reason: . |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 49
![]() |
Looks like it is not a NOS piece after all - the movement not matching the case appears to clinch this.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|